A lot - or little - can happen to individuals abroad, students or otherwise. 19th century diaries by English women cruising the Nile and other destinations suggest that they had never actually left England. My own sense is that, given the easy and cheap availability of the internet and telephone, the kind of growth that is associated with making a break - confronting the foreign - occurs less often than before, since individuals can carry culture with them. Maybe similar to the way luxury cars reproduce the easy chair and living room, making it harder to experience wind and road.
Being near the station, the owner also being a pastor, and La Croisee offering the cheapest rooms in town all create the grey zone we now inhabit, welcoming the occasional unexpected guest. There was a elderly woman day one, asking for money, and the 3 policemen on day 3 evicting an unwelcomed stranger who was asleep and drunk in another guest's bed (always remember to lock your door).
The city itself has been floating in the margins, flirting with an experimental, unorthodox drug policy, thereby attracting Europeans in search of an unregulated good time. There was a referendum (voted down) in the last election to create a free shooting-up heroin zone ("needle park"). The city has been making heroin available and not prosecuting, believing that decriminalizing would also prevent crime, as well as lower the drug overdose rate; recent research suggests neither.
Also, Michael came home from school saying, "America is a bad country" which was annoying. Another family we know has encountered this numerous times in their tiny mountain village. Not sure what to do with it at this point, but I suspect he picked it up from classmates. Michael has never been one to cast blame, and this was no exception, as he warded off my prying, refusing to go into it.
This election poster by the Swiss People's Party (has the majority seats in Parliament) isn't anti-American, but more anti-refugee. There is sympathy for the movement by a lot of sensible people we know, since much of the increase in crime has been traced to refugees, but hope for a solution other than racism. Reminds us of the Japan we knew, where a shop owner or realtor could tell you directly he wouldn't serve you because he didn't like foreigners! Our racism usually disallows such honesty, so people mistreat each other while labelling it something else - conduct epitomized by the university, which has baptized this as a model for professional behavior.
4 comments:
Mike:
A couple of questions:
Are you stating that all degrees of racism are equivalent internationally, with the only difference being the extent to which people can be honest about it?
In what way do universities epitomize the behavior you are describing?
no, just commenting on certain hypocrisies that the PC culture in the US has created, contradicting how you actually behave against what people actually may officially say in public. Japanese realtors we knew of in the late 80s did not hesitate to tell you that they wouldn't serve you because they didn't like you. I see some of that kind of behavior over here.
The university system of promotion and tenure can similarly mask cruder human intentions of through duplicitous performance reviews; ie backstabbling.
Ring true at all?
Thanks for the clarification. Your first comment reminds me of our German visiting faculty colleague who would freak out other profs by saying things like "well, I just don't like Islam!". I think these forms of honesty are of course much more possible in homogeneous societies as opposed to multicultural ones.
Certainly we tart up nasty behavior with stories about objective performance, though I don't know it's less absurd outside of academia.
Patrick
I think what may be particularly strange about the academy and similar workplaces is its combining of a relative lack of objective criteria for professional reviews with the reality that much of the publications we want credit for are read by so few other individuals.
Post a Comment